STUDI KELAYAKAN USAHA DAN ANALISIS RESIKO LINGKUNGAN PENGOLAHAN LIMBAH PADAT IKAN PATIN (Pangasius hypopthalamus)

Hendrik Hendrik

Abstract


Traditional and modern food processing derived from catfish, such as fish fillets, smoked, salted, nuggets, meatballs, shredded and others; generate solid waste such as meat tetelan, abdominal fat, liver, bone, head, fins and innards. These wastes account for about 20-60% and is considered as part of that do not have economic value. Whereas solid waste is still potential as a raw material that contains relatively high nutritional value. Thus the utilization of solid waste that can generate added value in the form of raw materials and feed fish food industry. Conversely, if the solid waste is not utilized, will surely disturb the surrounding environment, good for water, air, soil, and the surrounding population. At this time there is no productive business specializing in the utilization of solid waste from the processing of catfish into industrial raw materials of food and fish feed. The possibility of this was due to the unavailability of data and information adequate technical and economical. In order to meet the needs of the research that was conducted. This study aimed to analyze the economic valuation of the utilization of industrial solid waste processing of catfish, the raw material of functional food and feed that meet the quality standards in accordance with the National Standards Indonnesia (SNI) as well as to determine the recommendation whether it is feasible or not the establishment of the business of processing food and feed of waste Solid results catfish processing of household or industrial scale. This research is a lab-scale experiments using technology that has undergone several modifications. The results showed that the technology is capable of producing industrial raw materials in the form of Fish Protein Concentrate (KPI), fish oil, bone meal and pyloric caeca crude enzyme in accordance with the Indonesian National Standard. , Judging from the environmental impact assessment and business analysis Gross NPV Rp. 24.788.000, BCR 1.15, IRR of 65.91% ,PR of 2.607 , then the utilization of solid waste business establishment catfish processing household scale feasible.

Keywords


Feasibility Study; Solid Waste Catfish; Industrial Raw Materials and NPV; IRR.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonim, 2007. Pengelolaan Limbah Industri Pangan. Direktorat Jenderal Industri Kecil Menengah Departemen Perindustrian. Jakarta.

Barton, D. N. 1994. Economic Factors and Valuation of Tropical Coastal Resources. SMR-report 14/94. Centre for Studies of Environment and Resources, University of Bergen, Norway.

Bunce, L. L., and Kent R. Gustavson. 1998. Coral reef valuation: a rapid socioeconomic assessment of fishing, water-sports, and hotel operations in the Montego bay marine park, Jamaica and an analysis of reef management implications. World Bank Research Committee Project #RPO 681-05

Cesar, H. S. J. 1996. Economic Analysis of Indonesian Coral Reefs. Working Paper Series. World Bank, Washington DC.

Ministry of Marine Affair and Fisheries Republic of Indonesia (MMAF). 2001. Country Status Overview (CSO): Exploitation and Trade of Reef Fishery in Indonesia. MMAF, International Marine Alliance (IMA) and Telapak Foundation. Jakarta.

Suharsono. 2001. Condition of Coral Reef Resource in Indonesia. Oceanological Research and Development Centre, Indonesian Science Agency. Paper presented in International Workshop on the Trade in Stony Corals: Development of sustainable management guidelines. Jakarta, April 9-12, 2001.

Spurgeon, J. P. G. 1992. The economic valuation of coral reefs. Mar. Poll. Bull. 24 (11): 529-536. ©Elsevier Science Ltd. Pergamon.

Wallace, C. C., Z. Richards, and Suharsono. 2001. Regional Distribution Patterns of Acropora and Their Use in the Conservation of Coral Reefs in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Coastal and Marine Resources. 4(1):40-58

Agustono. 1996. Nilai Ekonomi Hutan Mangrove bagi Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di Muara Cimanuk, Indramayu). Tesis Magister Sains (Tidak Dipublikasikan). Program Pascasarjana IPB. Bogor.

Barton, D. N. 1994. Economic Factors and Valuation of Tropical Coastal Resources. SMR-report 14/94. Center for Studies of Environment and Resources, University of Bergen. Norway.

Burbridge, P. R. and J. E. Maragos. 1985. Coastal Resources Management and Environmental Assesment Needs for Aquatic Resources development in Indonesia. International Institute for Environment and Development. Washington DC. USA.

Dahuri, R., J. Rais, S. P. Ginting dan M. J. Sitepu. 1996. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Wilayah Pesisir dan Lautan Secara Terpadu. PT Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Dixon, J. A. dan M. M. Hufschmidt. 1991. Teknik Penilaian Ekonomi terhadap Lingkungan. Suatu Buku Kerja Studi Kasus. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta

Fahrudin, Achmad. 2009. Analisis Ekonomi Pengelolaan Lahan Pesisir di Kabupaten Subang, Jawa Barat. TesisMagister Sains (Tidak Dipublikasikan). Program Pascasarjana IPB. Bogor.

Lindeboom, H. J. and J. J. Sandee. 1989. Production and Consumption of Tropical Seagrass Fields in Easterm Indonesia. Measured with Bell Jars and Microelectrodes. Netherland Journal of Sea Research. 23: 181-190.

Mann, K. H. 1982. Ecology of Coastal Waters: A System Approach. Blackwell Scientific Publ. Univ. of Calif. Press, Los Angeles




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jil.10.1.p.78-86

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Pascasarjana Universitas Riau

License URL: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.